Feedback Questionnaire

New recruitment data shows 96% of recruitment strategies hit by Brexit

With just under a year to go until Brexit, a worrying 96% of recruiters and HR managers are having to rethink their recruitment and hiring strategies to cope with Brexit, according to new research from LinkedIn. Indeed, 46% of respondents are seeing a ‘big’ or ‘huge’ impact as the UK becomes less attractive to international talent. The LinkedIn’s April Workforce Report, which examines job movement across the professional networking site’s 24m members in the UK and is designed to provide members, businesses and policymakers with evidence-based insights into the changing shape of the UK workforce, also shows that the UK is losing talent to the European Union. This month the report also included the results of an independent ‘Recruiter Sentiment’ survey that gauges UK based in-house and agency recruiters’ confidence in their ability to fill available roles: reflecting the trends they are seeing in the marketplace. The survey found that hiring professionals are seeing a negative impact on international hiring into the UK, with 37% of recruiters seeing a decrease in candidates from EU countries over the last quarter. And it’s not just EU candidates being put off by Brexit either as recruiters are seeing a decrease in hires from such countries as the USA, Canada, Australia, South Africa too. This offers the worrying prospect that any fall in EU candidates won’t be filled easily by those from non-EU countries. The figures highlight the negative impact on international hiring into the UK from the following countries over the last quarter: Italy – 37% France – 35% Germany – 35% Netherlands – 32% Spain – 29% Other 27 EU countries...

Delivering results for our clients – the ThinkinCircles way. A case study on LMA Recruitment

Sometimes here at ThinkinCircles our clients come to us with a specific marketing problem they need to resolve swiftly and efficiently but without spending a fortune! It’s exactly the kind of challenge we relish and with our many years of experience we are always on hand to offer a prudent, well considered solution that achieves the desired results. One such client, LMA Recruitment, an international multi award winning specialist recruiters had just such a challenge from their London based Secretarial recruitment team. The London market for secretarial staff (Secretaries, Personal Assistants, Executive Assistants, Receptionists etc.) is fiercely competitive and the talent in the marketplace tends to utilise search engine results to find the best recruiters and the latest vacancies – naturally then, the key way gain an advantage in the marketplace is to rank well on Google. LMA were falling behind on that score and ranked midway on page four of the organic results. Simply not good enough for an agency that prides itself on the very highest standards in recruitment and a service level second to none. The challenge was on, get LMA ranking significantly higher for their specialist sector within the capital, the most competitive region of all. Initial research showed their position for the vital keywords was poor, mid page four rankings – effectively lost on Google, we needed to achieve page one results, and quickly. The team at ThinkinCircles devised a marketing strategy which included a carefully orchestrated mix of on-site search engine optimisation, social media marketing, blogging and article content creation and a small Google Adwords budget. The results were stunning, after one month...

What you need to know about the Facebook scandal

For most of us, the Facebook scandal is current and significant news, however the full details, the size, reach and impacts of the controversy are in many ways somewhat of a mystery. Ok, yes we get that the personal data of Facebook users has been mishandled and that there have long been reservations about the enormous amount of information Facebook collects. Plus, we grasp that this is a big deal as Facebook has nearly two billion users around the globe. Plus, we are aware that for Facebook this is a total branding nightmare. Yet, you could be forgiven for not being fully aware that when you delve deeper into the scandal it actually starts to read like the script of a Hollywood blockbuster, involving the most controversial and nasty US presidential campaigner ever, allegations that the world’s largest social network listens to users’ conversations through the microphone on their smart phones and after much speculation, the revelation that during the 2016 U.S. election a handful of Russian actors manipulated Facebook users by spreading misinformation on the social network. See what I mean, I’m even thinking Matt Damon for the lead, how about you? So, let’s look at how all this started The whole scandal stems from news that in 2007 Facebook allowed access to the data they held on their users. App creators, developers of games, social software and dating apps, plus academics, researchers and marketers all gained access to the data of Facebook’s users. In 2015 Facebook learnt that Aleksandr Kogan, a psychology professor at the University of Cambridge had broken its data policies when he shared user...

Why JD Wetherspoons decision to quit social media is down to them having the wrong strategy

This month amid a media frenzy and ironically a lot of trending on social media, saw JD Wetherspoons’ Chairman Tim Martin announce that with immediate effect the pub chain would be closing all of its social media accounts, in order to channel its communications directly via an in-house magazine and website. Martin said he took the decision after becoming increasingly concerned by reports of MPs and public figures being targeted by trolls and following the Facebook Cambridge Analytica data scandal. He also expressed a view that there is an unhealthy “compulsion” among social media users to spend too much time on platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Martin felt that Wetherspoons’ staff were spending an increasing amount of time dealing with social media messages and that he was not convinced that being on social media sites brought any commercial benefit to the business. Wetherspoon certainly isn't the only company to recently remove itself from social media platform. Indeed, the call to #DeleteFacebook after the Facebook Cambridge Analytica data scandal saw Playboy, Tesla and SpaceX delete its Facebook account. So, you do have to ask yourself the question was JD Wetherspoons’ decision the right one? Well, no one can deny that Chairman Tim Martin knows his market, especially as his company keeps going from strength to strength, when on average 4 pubs close a week in the UK. He also knows his customers, so maybe he is truly making a stand for his customers by changing his digital policy. Or it could be a strategy based on the fact that he has previously blamed social media and in particular Facebook as...

All you need to know about blockchains and their benefits to recruitment

You could be forgiven if you’ve filed knowing about Blockchains under must do/sort later, after all isn’t it all about finance and bitcoins and nothing to do with recruiting, staffing or HR? You certainly wouldn’t have been wrong if you had taken this approach, as in reality although blockchains have been around since 2008, as part of the digital bitcoin currency concept, they have had little, if any, application in recruitment. That was until now. At the end of last year, Technojobs.co.uk the UK’s leading IT Jobs Board, announced their partnership with the world’s first blockchain career verification platform APPII. This ground breaking move allows candidates to apply for roles using CVs verified by blockchains and ensures recruiters and employers know that the information is trustworthy and authenticated. So what actually is a blockchain? A blockchain is a digital database system of record keeping, where each entry and its details are validated and recorded across a network of decentralised computers. The records are shared with many and everyone has access to the distributed database records (the block), however it is only shared after all parties involved have verified the accuracy of the information. The chain happens as each block of information notes the block of information before which has a timestamp, ensuring it is impossible to tamper with or alter and everyone’s copy of the distributed blockchain is kept in synch. Users can only edit the parts of the blockchain that they “own” by possessing the private keys necessary to write to the file. As a blockchain is not stored on a centralised server or held by any one...